The expert panel for the substantive evaluation of prescribing milk replacers at the Supreme Medical Council, after analyzing specific cases of a particular doctor's use of milk replacers and on the basis of documentation provided by doctors, unanimously concluded that there were medical indications for prescribing these preparations in the cases under consideration. Thus, penalties for so-called undue reimbursement were wrongly imposed.
The imposition of financial penalties on doctors by the NFZ has stirred up a lot of controversy, and the Supreme Medical Chamber has taken a number of activities since the beginning of the case to support the aggrieved doctors and prove that they acted solely for the benefit of patients. Among other things, a number of meetings were held between the penalized doctors and the NFZ and the Ministry of Health. (...)
The NIL's actions sparked a media discussion, and the issue of penalties for prescribing milk replacers ...
Content locked
To gain access to the complete English section of the Medexpress.pl, kindly reach out to us at [email protected].
If you already have an account, please log in
